DjLizard.net » General

Birthday

DjLizard — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:35:50 +0000

I was so busy I forgot about my birthday. It was August 3rd.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

So I downloaded a "registry cleaner"…

DjLizard — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:26:14 +0000

This comment prompted me to download a program called Uniblue RegistryBooster. Kim Komando said it was good. _^Heh.

c|net has a quote blurb on the Uniblue website that says:

This easy-to-use tool lets you remove faulty Registry entries that slow down your computer.

Removing a kilobyte of cruft should net you what, a gain of 10 nanoseconds for every 15,000 value reads?*
_{*: Actual value may vary**}
_{^{**: Variance not guaranteed}}

I also don't think removing registry keys is the start to solving your Windows problems, but I'm going to run it for science!

As soon as I launched it, it performed its whole system scan.

A total of 311 invalid Registry entries were found on your System. Click on "Repair Registry" to fix all entries.

On the Overview tab, it says my registry health is low. Uh oh, I should be seeing errors and crashing all of the time, then, right?

I don't know if it's a function of not being registered, but since the window cannot be resized (giant skinned window with Vista style minimize and close buttons) and there isn't a horizontal scrollbar in the results area, I can't read the full path to most of the keys so that I can verify the results. Well, you can read the log file though. It opens an HTML log from Uniblue's area of your user profile's Application Data folder in your default web browser and it contains all of the information you need, should you actually know what you're looking at.

It found quite a few missing ActiveX/COM+/DCOM/OLE objects, which is the largest group of "errors" any registry cleaner can find in your system. This is because ActiveX, COM, and OLE (which all store and retrieve information to/from HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT) are so frequently used and are so frequently damaged (in one way or another). This could happen if you move the file to another drive or folder or if a module crashed while trying to register or unregister itself. The majority of what Dial-a-fix does is register ActiveX/COM/OLE objects, such as the components that run Windows Update. (Dial-a-fix tells the modules to self-register, this way, Dial-a-fix does not have to know the exact registry keys and values needed to make a module work again.)

Almost all of the ActiveX/COM errors that registry cleaners find can be ignored. There are a few things registry cleaners can figure out that are harmful to the speed of your system, but they don't occur very frequently. If you had a file type registered to a program that exists on a mapped drive and that network share was down but still listed as a mapped drive, you might get slowdowns as Windows tries to figure out where the share is. Registry cleaners are also able to remove invalid OpenWith entries, which is a good thing to do just to tidy the list of broken icons and to save Windows from having to check for non-existent locations. A lot of keys chosen for removal just contain MRU (most recently used) paths to things I have accessed using whatever program the MRU list is for. Removing these keys isn't really going to "repair" your computer.

Still, for the average user, cleaning this cruft will probably not visibly impact performance to the point that such a program should scan your entire system every startup.

At least RegistryBooster isn't taking up a lot of memory.

Another problem with registry cleaners is that you're at the mercy of the database and program version you have. Compounding this is that each registry cleaner program is third-party, meaning they all can have potentially differing opinions on what constitutes an invalid entry. There is the potential to ruin your computer by removing things that need to stay — many a registry cleaner has had to come out with program fixes and registry patches for things erroneously removed. I would hate to be a tech support person for a registry cleaning program. I'm sure there a lot of irate people who:

Have had things removed from their system that shouldn't be, and are having new problems because of it
Have other problems such as hard drive and memory problems and will blame the company for problems with their computer because the last thing they remember using was the registry cleaner program
Have other problems as mentioned above and corruption occurs after a registry clean because of interference from the faulty hardware
Have problems that can't be solved by a registry clean (which is to say most problems) and are upset that this program has not improved the performance or stability of their machine

Here's an issue I've found already, and I'm not very far through my results log:
RegistryBooster wants to remove HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows Search\CrawlScopeManager\Windows\SystemIndex\DefaultRules\22 because it says "file:///c:\ " is a bad path. This isn't true – this is the format Windows Search uses for indexing rules. If I remove this stuff, I suspect Windows Search will forget how to search my system, and had I not read through the log, I would later wonder how it disappeared. I might not even connect its destruction with my use of a registry cleaner – another big problem. Obviously something has directed RegistryBooster to look here, yet it does not actually understand what it is seeing and recommending for removal.

When I chose to "repair" the registry entries, it told me I should make a backup, which is a good idea. The bad thing is that it is only going to delete all of the registry entries, not really "repair" them. What if the file can be found elsewhere on the drive? Should it scan my filesystem and put together the puzzle and point the key at the new location? It's probably difficult to decide when such a scan should be the answer, so instead of opts to delete every error that has been found rather than trying to fix it. Because of the endless possibilities, scanning for files and pointing erroneous keys to the findings is probably just as bad an idea as mass deletion.

I'm barely through the first few lines of the log and I have all of this to say – this should give you a clear indication of my opinion of registry cleaners. I'm giving this one a chance, but it seems like it's just like all the rest and has all of the same pitfalls as anything else.

I can give RegistryBooster one thing: it did find quite a lot of missing TypeLib entries that really are missing, although like I've said before, it's not really going to speed up my computer all that much. This is only a few kilobytes of text in my 35 megabyte registry.

I don't like that there isn't a "jump to value" context menu entry on each item in the results pane – it makes fact-checking take quite a bit longer.

I've also noticed that registry cleaners tend to find Explorer's "auto" file extension creation entries, and RegistryBooster is no exception. There's no point in removing auto entries as they will just come right back as soon as Explorer sees the file extension again.

It feels like it's very limited since I'm only testing the trial version, but I don't think I really need to see any more.

In the end, I can't really recommend this sort of program to anyone (no offense to Uniblue) and I did not end up removing any of the things it said I should. I can't really give it a 1-to-5 stars type rating, so I'll give it a rating of N/A.

There is one decent registry cleaner that I've found that generally does the same thing (finds COM junk and missing font entries, etc) and isn't too aggressive with its scans: CCleaner's Issues scanner. CCleaner's Issues scanner reminds me of one final point: registry cleaners don't take into account the things that they orphan from their first scan. After you remove 300 things from your registry, chances are that there is another 200 things that have become orphaned from the first sweep. If I ever wrote a registry cleaner (which I will not) I would have it check for "dependencies" and list them as sub-items of the main items, so that it basically says "if you choose to remove X, I'm removing Y also because it's orphaned by the removal of X".

*Anti-climactic cliffhanger ending*.

© DjLizard for DjLizard.net, 2007. | Permalink | 14 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: Kim Komando, registry, registry cleaner

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

08-03-1981

DjLizard — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:22:40 +0000

It is my birthday today. Consider sending me some birthday money! :D

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

BenQ apologizes for distasteful advert

DjLizard — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 06:41:02 +0000

I posted before about BenQ's use of the WTC wreckage as a background image, and they have since apologized and "put a process in place to prevent this type of incident from happening again". I never went back to the site so I didn't know they had already changed it.

At the time of writing, they have an apology graphic up at http://www.benq.com.cn/musiq/

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

WTC wreckage used in BenQ promotion?

DjLizard — Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:02:39 +0000

http://www.benq.com.cn/musiq/

Compare to:
1
and
2
and
3

I'm going to go with "not good" on this one.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool

fredvries — Sat, 23 Sep 2006 19:46:16 +0000

Every second Tuesday of each month an update of the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool (aka MSRT) is released.

It is a very useful little tool that can detect and remove a growing number of viruses, worms, trojans and rootkits. And the best part of it is that is free. ‘Free?’ I hear you say, ‘from Microsoft?’ And the answer is, perhaps surprisingly, ‘Yes, it is!’

According to Microsoft the tool has been used a staggering 2.7 billion times and in doing so it detected and removed 16 million instances of malware from 5.7 million infected computers. In most cases the Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool removed just one single malware variant from a computer but in some cases it has removed dozens and even hundreds of malware variants from computers. This last number can be easily explained by the fact that a backdoor can download lots of other malicious programs.

How do they know, you wonder? Well, just like the error reports you voluntarily should send to Microsoft when your computer experiences a serious problem and has to shut down, the Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool will send a report to Microsoft with just the basic information about the malware it detected and removed. And just like you should never disable the error reporting service, you should never stop this tool from reporting its findings to Microsoft. Both send no identifiable personal info about you or your computer to Microsoft.

Using this information Microsoft recently published a report in which some interesting points are made.

It transpired that instances of an infection dramatically fell after a particular infection was added to the Microsoft Malicious Removal Tool. Some families of malware experienced decreases greater than 75%. Well, they would, wouldn’t they? Because people only use this program if and when their computers were infected.

Microsoft doesn’t make any comments about how it is possible that all that malware wasn’t blocked, detected or removed in the first place by an up-to-date anti-virus and anti-spyware product. Even now, after so much publicity and crashed computers, people are still strangely complacent about their security and privacy.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

TheNotifier v0.0.0.26 (alpha)

DjLizard — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 02:53:13 +0000

NOTE: Do not redistribute TheNotifier. It is for personal testing only.

Download: TheNotifier v0.0.0.26 (~198KB, *.exe)

As explained previously, this is a prototype app I'm working on which will help me (and eventually you) fight certain malware attacks. At the moment, it just allows you look at what's going on.

As always, comment here, or post at the "Lunarsoft.net DjLizard.net software support forum" (preferred).

Changelog:

* Moved to tabbed interface
* Added more specific filtering functions (None, known, or Microsoft)
* Added AppInit_DLLs tab with basic support (very alpha) – more to come
* 'Jump to key' when on the AppInit_DLLs tab will take you to the 'Windows' key (where AppInit_DLLs is)
* Added the following known-good Notify entries: avldr, Caveo, ckpNotify, Command AntiVirus Download, ComPlusSetup, CwWLEvent, dimsntfy, DPWLN, FolderGuard, GoToMyPC, loginkey, MetaFrame, nwprovau, OPXGina, PCANotify, PFW, ppeclt, PRISMAPI.DLL, PRISMGNA.DLL, psfus, QConGina, RAinit, RegCompact, SABWinLogon, SDNotify, Sebring, T3Notify, TabBtnWL, Timbuktu Pro, tpfnf2, tpgwlnotify, tphotkey, VESWinlogon, WB, WBSrv, Zboard, zsnotify

I have a list of many known-good AppInit_DLLs so you don't have to let me know about those yet.

Also, I have a lot of work left on DAF before I can release another update, so don't worry.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

MSHTML.DLL

DjLizard — Wed, 14 Jun 2006 02:56:49 +0000

It's patch tuesday – a bunch of fixes came out. Visit Windows Update to get them, or wait for them to be downloaded with idle network bandwidth, by BITS.

I haven't been paying attention lately (I've been quite busy) but a new version of MSHTML.DLL is out – 6.00.2900.2912. It can't be registered (at all), thankfully. The previous version, .2838, was not supposed to be registerable either, but Microsoft broke it. This time, it spits out an error code (specifically, hex 0x80029c4a / decimal -2147312566: TYPE_E_CANTLOADLIBRARY). Dial-a-fix v0.58 (which is pretty close to being v0.60) recognizes certain versions of files now, and ignores the ones it knows it can't register. I'll have a new public beta soon, I think. I've got to do some more private testing first (I've made a truckload of changes since the last public beta).

edit: Wait, the one on my dev machine is 6.0.2900.2912, and it DOES register. Something's not right here!

edit 2: Ok, I found out what the problem is. A rogue program removed mshtml.tlb because it thought it was no longer being used. WTF! Ugh, 3rd party software. This post has been rendered invalid. At least I have something to check for with Dial-a-fix now…

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Digital Doctors

DjLizard — Fri, 26 May 2006 03:46:09 +0000

I work for Digital Doctors. The tech manager and I just converted our website from a static Dreamweaver HTML-uncompliant mess to a brand spankin' new WordPress site, and the result is outstanding. The look is finally consistent, it's easy to edit, it's 100 times faster than the old site, standards compliant, dynamic, and easy for search engines to spider. I will also be writing articles for it for our current and future customers — so they will not be as technical as the articles I post here.

Anyway, if you live in Bradenton, Sarasota (or anywhere else in Manatee/Sarasota county) Florida, you can bring your computer to our shop and I will work on it! If you live in Tampa/St. Petersburg/Clearwater, you can call and one of our skilled technicians can come to you.

Our labor rates are not the highest, and not the lowest, but there's no other computer repair facility in a 50 mile radius that can do what we do – we are the best, most fair shop at which I've ever had the pleasure of working. Most repairs are 1 to 1½ hours, but we have a max labor rate of 2 hours — no matter how many things we do, the most you will ever be charged for is 2 hours of labor (plus parts, if applicable). We're also able to work on smaller things in quarter-hour increments. Give us a call for current labor rates.

Digital Doctors
7333 52nd Place East,
Bradenton, FL 34203
1-941-747-9477 Sarasota/Manatee (ask for Mike if you want to talk to me!)
1-727-541-4410 Pinellas
1-813-932-4500 Tampa

Here's a Yahoo! map of our location.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Google advanced operators

DjLizard — Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:34:51 +0000

Fred pointed out this nice guide to Google's advanced operators. I knew less than half of the operators. (I only knew about several of the [all/]in* ones).

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Dial-a-fix v0.54 beta released

DjLizard — Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:24:26 +0000

DAF v0.54 is ready.
* Changed default behavior of Windows Installer checkmarks (2.0 and 3.0): they are now unchecked by default
* Windows Installer 2.0 checkmark will disable all other checkmarks for safety purposes (because you must reboot after installing it)
* Removed a few command-line switches from the XML parser installers; they should run silently on all platforms again
* DAF now stops BITS when doing 'Flush SoftwareDistribution', and the status bar is more descriptive about the process
* DAF now stops BITS, WUAUSERV, and CRYPTSVC when deleting Catroot2 (just in case), and the status bar is more descriptive as well
* Minor dialog adjustments, and the addition of a Paypal donation link to the contact pane

In the next version, I hope to add a new pane which fixes network connectivity issues (thanks for reminding me of that, Fred). I have to give Fred shout-outs because he seems to be the biggest Dial-a-fix fan. :P

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Paypal donation system open

DjLizard — Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:01:08 +0000

I have set up a Paypal donation system. Use it if you enjoyed my crappy site or Dial-a-fix or something. I have pretty big credit card debt, so start emptying your wallets.

|
v

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Well, it does!

DjLizard — Tue, 08 Nov 2005 02:39:44 +0000

http://ebaumsworldsucks.com/

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Forum

DjLizard — Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:06:04 +0000

Yes, my forum is gone.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

LOL – The Movie

DjLizard — Wed, 07 Sep 2005 03:38:16 +0000

It doesn't get any worse. Make it stop.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Re: prefetch

DjLizard — Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:29:41 +0000

http://blogs.msdn.com/ryanmy/archive/2005/05/25/421882.aspx

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Stuff

DjLizard — Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:40:48 +0000

I took this test and scored:

English Genius
You scored 100% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 100% Advanced, and 100% Expert!

Not that it's a big surprise. The test is pretty easy if you paid attention in the 3rd grade. Oh, you didn't? Pump my gas.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Tangent 2

DjLizard — Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:23:02 +0000

It's pretty hard to get time to work on this site when I'm so busy fixing unfixable computers. Norton Internet Security (actually, all Symantec/Norton) products are hereby boycotted.

I've never seen such a lousy setup in all of my life. Their products can barely hold themselves together in a standalone installation, let alone integration with other Symantec/Norton products. Remember when Norton Utilities used to be awesome? (I'm talking about the DOS 6.22 days, when everything worked properly and software that glitched up was actually surprising) There will be no discussion of those products on this website any further.

I've also quit visiting the CCleaner forums. (Don't even ask me about it, unless you like to banned at the IP level from this site.)

EDIT>> That was kind of nice how they gave me a farewell. I lied about not going back, I really did want to see what they'd say ;) That was even pretty cool how Eldmannen said he'd miss me. ANYWAY… I'm working with Tarun to get his site up [hooked him up with lunarsoft.net and ToastyX, who hosts THIS site ;)] I hope to get the shoutbox up soon. Or a small message board that doesn't require registering, or something. I dunno, I'll look around.

I'm tired of bad grammar. Worse than that, I'm tired of bad grammar rules. Why is it again that I am supposed to put punctuation inside of a quotation? Oh, so that way the quotation is no longer exactly accurate? If I quote someone and they didn't have a period in their quote, it's going outside the quotation marks, damn it.

Example:

Click Start, click Run, and then type "notepad."

Therefore, on this site, I obey only those grammar rules that make sense. I will also obey grammar rules that I have personally deemed accurate. Don't even get me started about ending sentences in prepositions, because there's no point to that so-called rule at all. If you look it up, it turns out it's not really a rule at all, but just one man's doctrine. He tried to convince everyone that they were doing it all wrong. I think he succeeded in duping the masses, but I am not so easily fooled.

That is the sort of grammar up with which I cannot put.

I don't want to bring back a forum (yet(?)) but I'm going to try to put a live (no refreshing required!) shoutbox in soon, so at least people can leave messages to each other. This should work well, except for spammers, so I'll have to look out for that. I hate nothing more than someone advertising their site on my site without any sort of permission.

I'm sick of the MUD already (too buggy, unfinished), so for all those who want to play something good, they should probably check out EUO. I made the installer. ^_^
Our MUD is gone now. People actually liked the BBS door games, but alas, they are for DOS and they destroy my machine (thanks, NTVDM). PS: don't reply to this with ways to make it work, I don't care about the door games anymore.

It seems that all mmorpg servers that are available for download are either pieces of crap, or are only for Windows (who wants to run an mmorpg server via WINDOWS?!). I haven't found anything good yet. Wishing now that I could run a private EUO server.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Birthday

DjLizard — Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:32:33 +0000

Oh yeah, I'm 24 today.

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Tangent 1

DjLizard — Wed, 03 Aug 2005 03:57:01 +0000

I'm sure everybody's heard of the Mighty Mouse by now. Pop culture and pop tech news travels fast around here. I usually hear the same news four to seven times a day, every day, my entire life. If you ever see me parrot some stupid news that everybody knows by now, such as the aforementioned Mighty Mouse, then you can rest assured that I did it so that people would notice and stop telling me about it. ;)

Apple's marketing department is talented. I love the way the Apple website looks and feels, and the way they structure everything. That was a trip when their site went black while Tiger was getting ready for release.

I feel so paranoid.

Thanks to Tarun for the heads up on this site: XP SP3
Nice. Too bad the site has creepy Google ads (notice I dropped them) that always try to sell you spyware and crap. Yeah, get these registry cleaners that do more harm than good. Google, why must you only peddle junk software that tends towards scams and spyware? I never really see actual good software listed there. Ever. Stupid asses. Over the years, Windows has hardened itself against the number one threat to Windows stability that has ever existed: every thread or process that could ever exist that was not originally installed by your Windows installation media. That's right, you third party imbeciles, stop making crappy software.

DjLizard> did you miss me
DjLizard> or did you nearly hit me
ToastyX> I missed you, I missed you, now I have to kiss you
ToastyX> OHHHHHHHHHHHHH I GET IT NOW

This just in… http://www.start.com/1/ http://www.start.com/2/ http://www.start.com/3/ (and of course http://www.google.com/ig)

// 2005/08/03 —–

Newhotness asks:

not sure if you know or not, but is the mighty mouse only usable on a mac? and if not, is there any benefit to using it on an XP comp?

It works on PC as well. The USB Device Class Definition for Human Interface Devices (HID) (defined by the USB Implementers Forum, Inc.), contains universal implementations of mice, keyboards, pen/tablet, and other input devices that modern operating systems perfectly understand (Windows, Mac OS X, Linux kernel 2.6, etc.). You can plug a Windows mouse into a Mac or a Mac mouse into Windows (give or take features and drawbacks). I prefer using my imfamous Logitech Wheel Mouse Optical (Blue) on my Apple Powerbook G4. I have three Optical Blues, my mom and dad have one, and even ToastyX has a Blue. (Part # 830386-0000)
Using the previous Mac mouse in Windows really sucks… it only has one button (well, its entire body is the button), and no scroll wheel. It's like a cro-magnon mouse. Unga, me click-*pound*.

Using the Logitech Blue on that is excellent – scroll wheel is detected and used, second button performs command+clicking, which is exactly the same as right-clicking in Windows. Using this new mouse in Windows should prove interesting… 360-degree scroll ball. What if I don't want to scroll sort of sideways while I'm scrolling up and down?

Yes, USB keyboards are HID-compliant as well. Logitech's keyboards are sometimes printed with both Mac and Windows meta-key symbols/names, making them that much more attractive in the marketplace. Too bad I've always hated Logitech (and Microsoft) keyboards… suckers. I use an IBM Model "M" keyboard (no, not buckling spring version (the rubber dome version). I'm not into giving my fingers more of a workout than they already get when going 120 words per minute).

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh